Change to Ukrainian interface versionChange to English interface versionChange to Russian interface versionHome pageClear last query resultsHelp page
Search for specific termsBrowse by subject categoryBrowse alphabetical list of titlesBrowse by organizationBrowse special topic issues

close this bookNGO Responses to HIV/AIDS In Asia (UNDP; 1992)
View the documentACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Open this folder and view contentsPREFACE
Open this folder and view contentsINTRODUCTION
Open this folder and view contentsCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND AIDS PREVENTION: The South India AIDS Action Programme, Madras
Open this folder and view contentsKLONG TOEY: FACING UP TO AIDS IN A BANGKOK SLUM: The Duang Prateep Foundation and the AIDS Counselling and Training Centre
Open this folder and view contentsCOMMERCIAL BLOOD DONORS AND AIDS PREVENTION: The Gujarat AIDS Prevention Unit, Ahmedabad
Open this folder and view contentsFAMILY PLANNING AND AIDS PREVENTION: The Planned Parenthood Association of Thailand (PPAT)
Open this folder and view contentsSHARING THE CHALLENGE OF AIDS PREVENTION: The Community AIDS Service Penang
close this folderFACILITATORS’ NOTES: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND AIDS PREVENTION - The Southern India AIDS Action Programme, Madras
View the documentDiscussion Question 1: What strategies did SIAAP use to identify community needs for HIV/AIDS interventions and to determine SIAAP's response? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the approach it took?
View the documentDiscussion Question 2: What do you see as the possible organisational (internal) problems that may face SIAAP within the next 12 months? What suggestions could you make to help SIAAP deal with these?
View the documentDiscussion Question 3: What impact did donor funding have on SIAAP? What steps could SIAAP take to minimise the disadvantages of accepting external funding? What strategies might SIAAP use to further develop the support it gets from local sources?
View the documentDiscussion Question 4: What recommendations would you make to Shyamla and the team on how they might continue to develop their programmes in the future?
Open this folder and view contentsFACILITATORS’ NOTES: KLONG TOEY: FACING UP TO AIDS IN A BANGKOK SLUM - The Duang Prateep Foundation and The AIDS Counselling and Training Centre
Open this folder and view contentsFACILITATORS' NOTES: COMMERCIAL BLOOD DONORS AND AIDS PREVENTION - SIRMCE and the Gujarat AIDS Prevention Unit, Ahmedabad
Open this folder and view contentsFACILITATORS' NOTE: FAMILY PLANNING AND AIDS PREVENTION - The Planned Parenthood Association of Thailand (PPAT)
Open this folder and view contentsFACILITATORS' NOTE: SHARING THE CHALLENGE OF AIDS PREVENTION - The Community AIDS Service Penang
 

FACILITATORS’ NOTES: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND AIDS PREVENTION - The Southern India AIDS Action Programme, Madras

GENERAL POINTS ABOUT USING THE CASE

1. Participants should be encouraged to read the case and to prepare their own analysis before it is discussed with others in the classroom. The discussion questions should be handed out with the case to assist participants in their analysis.

2. Generally, discussion of this case has required 1 1/2 to 2 hours (assuming that participants have previously read the case and prepared their own analysis).

3. The discussion questions included with this case are intended to help participants to focus on what were considered to be particularly important issues illustrated in the case. However, the case may raise many other interesting points for participants and they should be encouraged to examine, analyse and discuss these if raised.

4. The notes that follow are intended to assist the facilitator to prepare to teach the case. They provide a synopsis of the information given in the case, together with some ideas on strategies that SIAAP might adopt in the future. These notes should not replace the facilitator's own preparation and analysis. At all times, the facilitator should encourage the participants to reach their own conclusions, based upon a thorough analysis of the information given.

5. When introducing participants to the case, the facilitator should stress that the case is intended to facilitate discussion on important organisational and programmatic issues; it is not intended to demonstrate good or bad practices, nor to evaluate the work of SIAAP.

CASE SYNOPSIS

to previous section to next section

[Ukrainian]  [English]  [Russian]