Due to an oversight the table referred to in our last "Catchword" (gate 1/ 88, p. 11) has unfortunately been omitted. Here it is; we have also decided to reprint the "Catchword" text as an aid to interpreting the table. - Ed.
Micro-hydropower (MHP) is one of the less sophisticated technologies to harness waterpower and as a relatively low installed capacity per unit.
Micro-hydropower can be further subdivided into low-rpm water-wheels and medium or fast running turbines. It should be added here that waterwheel technology has been known to man for hundreds of years in many parts of the world which are today classed as developing countries. The crossflow (or Mitchell-Banki) turbine, which is widely used in micro-hydropower installations, features elements of both the waterwheel and large-scale water-power installations.
In many developing countries with major water power resources which have often only been marginally developed efforts are being or have been made to put this potential to better use. Water power is being harnessed to provide electricity for village communities as well as towns and is thus an important instrument of regional rural development.
These rural electrification programmes have, however, often failed because the quantities of energy used in the villages were so minimal that the receipts from sale of electricity were not even sufficient to cover the costs of the meter.
Villagers only need power in the evenings for electric light, radio, and perhaps television. Only the most wealthy families in the village can afford a refrigerator. In this way the total electricity consumed by a village household rarely exceeds ten or fifteen kilowatt hours in three months.
Changing over to smaller water power units, such as small and mini hydropower units, also failed to resolve this problem. Although this did not entail investment in high-voltage transmission lines the investment costs per installed capacity rose. The costly governing and control devices are only marginally cheaper for smaller units. In most countries this is the result of national legislation which lays down high quality standards and permits only slight deviations in voltage and frequency.
In this circumstances mini-hydropower plants can only be built at a few locations and only a few plants can be built per annum in any given country. These plants therefore have to be imported since local production does not appear economically viable. Importing machinery, however, entails the well-known problems when repairs are necessary: spare parts are expensive, delivery times long and the costs of employing foreign fitters astronomical. The table overleaf is a comparison of micro-hydropower and mini hydropower.
Since micro-hydropower is more attractive, GATE has decided with the approval of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Co-operation to use the wealth of experience available at organizations such as ITDG in the United Kingdom, SKAT in Switzerland and FAKT in the Federal Republic of Germany in implementing micro-hydropower projects of its own in various countries with suitable hydropower potential. This work is being co-ordinated by the Energy Section of the Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), GmbH.
[Ukrainian] [English] [Russian]