Change to Ukrainian interface versionChange to English interface versionChange to Russian interface versionHome pageClear last query resultsHelp page
Search for specific termsBrowse by subject categoryBrowse alphabetical list of titlesBrowse by organizationBrowse special topic issues

close this bookAction Against Child Labour (ILO; 2000; 356 pages)
View the documentPreface
Open this folder and view contents1. National policies and programmes
Open this folder and view contents2. Towards improved legislation
close this folder3. Improving the knowledge base on child labour
View the documentINTRODUCTION
Open this folder and view contents3.1 CHILD LABOUR STATISTICS: METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Open this folder and view contents3.2 BASIC RESULTS
Open this folder and view contents3.3 RECOMMENDATIONS ON CONDUCTING SURVEYS
close this folder3.4 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR INTERVIEWING CHILDREN
View the documentCreating the right setting
View the document3.5 FURTHER RESEARCH
View the documentAppendix 3.1 List of detailed variables in child labour surveys
View the documentBibliography on child labour surveys, statistics and related matters
Open this folder and view contents4. Alternatives to child labour
Open this folder and view contents5. Strategies to address child slavery
Open this folder and view contents6. Strategies for employers and their organizations
Open this folder and view contents7. Trade unions against child labour
Open this folder and view contents8. Awareness-raising
Open this folder and view contents9. Action by community groups and NGOs
Open this folder and view contents10. Resources on child labour
View the documentOther ILO publications
View the documentBack Cover
 

Creating the right setting

In-depth interviews with children should therefore be conducted in a setting outside the place of work, preferably a place where the child feels safe and comfortable. Unless the interviewer has a great deal of experience in interviewing children, it will also be necessary to build up the child's confidence in the person concerned. Training in working with children will also be needed because creativity is needed to elicit correct information.

Box 3.1. Case examples of interviewing children

In Bangladesh, an NGO called Shoishab persuaded employers in certain vicinities of Dhaka - such as a large apartment block or a street network - to permit their young domestic workers to attend an educational class several times a week. During the course of learning to read and write, opportunities were used to encourage the child domestics to talk about their situations. Drawing and story-telling were used for self-expression. When confidence had been built up, in-depth interviews could be conducted.

In Haiti, an NGO called Foyers Maurice Sixto has set up "family centres" for restavek children (domestic workers). The children may be sought out by enquiry among the local church congregation, or recommended by their parents. The centre provides a caring environment for the child domestics where they can rediscover their childhood, and develop their talents and self-esteem. This setting is suited to in-depth research into the children's predicament.

In the Philippines, an NGO called Visayan Forum in Manila made contact with young domestic workers in the park where they went on their day off. This led to the establishment of an Association of Household Workers. Visayan Forum conducts interviews to analyse the domestics' situation, and brings together those in the same ethno-linguistic group so that they can share their problems and give each other support.

Thus, interviewing children in depth, as opposed to asking broad questions, is best done over a period of time in a relatively unstructured and informal way. The ideal setting is an existing project in which (ex)-working children are participating, for example, a drop-in centre or an education programme.

If no such project currently exists, it is suggested that any attempt to collect in-depth information from the child workers at the employer's workplace or premises is postponed until it does. Here is a case where "action" should precede "research". However, there is no need to feel that the task is impossible. Some NGOs have set up projects with the twin purposes of action and research in mind, and have trained those who work with the children to collect information from them as part of their job.

Alternatively, researchers might identify - with help from social welfare departments and others - an existing institution such as a children's home where some children (child domestics or ex-domestics) are to be found, and conduct research among them. It cannot be stressed enough that in-depth qualitative research work with children, especially with those whose situation makes them especially vulnerable and predisposed not to trust adults, cannot be conducted by strangers in a cursory manner. The findings will be inaccurate and useless.

The interview process

In interviewing children about the effects of terms and conditions of work on their physical and mental well-being, it would be a good idea to seek advice from professional child care workers, as well as follow the suggestions below.

First, if you ask a child questions in a way which leads to a "yes" or "no", the child will probably answer accordingly. If you say: "Please tell me about....", or "Please describe to me...", you are likely to get more information. Similarly, sometimes a "leading" question such as "What do you think of ....?" or "What do you know (or "Do you know") about the difficulties (or other situation) at your school, or where you work, or with your employer, or at your home ...?", will result in more information.

Second, much information can only be gained indirectly.

Terms and conditions: A child will not understand these words very well. So ask him or her to describe the whole day's activities, from the moment he/she gets up in the morning, right through until bedtime. Questions can be included about what the employer says and does; and about meals, sleeping space, rest breaks and so on. From the very specific, the child could then be asked more general questions about visits from family members, holidays, outings, pay, and the like.

Effects on well-being: This is more difficult. As far as health is concerned, you could include "before" and "after" questions such as: "How does ...compare to ...at home?" (food, bedtime, getting-up time, aches and pains). For psychological impact, you could ask about "my happiest times", and "my saddest times", and about contact with friends and relations. The most important thing is to create an atmosphere in which the child feels sufficiently comfortable to tell stories about his or her intimate experiences and reveal his or her feelings. There may be some subjects - such as sexual abuse - which are especially hard to bring out. This is why time, trust, and the advice of child specialists are needed.

It should be borne in mind that this kind of investigation can be highly stressful for the child. Some researchers have found that an interview can make a child depressed, or cause him or her subsequently to run away. Therefore, they do not undertake in-depth interviewing without being prepared to provide help for the child - from their own NGO or some other childcare source - if help is sought.

Bearing in mind the delicacy with which interviewing should proceed, work out ahead of time what kind of subjects are relatively easy to open up, and what kind should not be opened without caution. You can then proceed from one to another, depending on the child's reaction. For example, you can start with questions about tasks, pay, and "gifts" such as shelter, clothing, fare home, and medical expenses. Then proceed to working hours, where the child sleeps, food and care, how often he/she has a day off. From these responses you may spot natural openings to questions about the treatment the child receives and how he or she feels about it. If at any time the child becomes distressed, you can stop.

Box 3.2. Case examples - focus groups

In Senegal, ENDA, an NGO, conducted a research project with young women domestics by focus group discussion. Each group discussion was treated as a social event - a "tea debate". Around 50 participants attended. They were mainly girl domestics, but also included some of their "aunties" and some older women domestics.

The ENDA facilitators found that the young girls were constrained and would not speak up. The older women automatically saw it as their role to dominate proceedings and act as a controlling influence. The facilitators therefore divided the groups up, and put the youngest domestics together. In a position of peer solidarity they could bring out their intimate problems, including sexual abuse by employers, and the fact that they felt forced into prostitution because their wages were so low.

As a result of these findings, a programme against sexually transmitted diseases was launched by ENDA. Group solidarity also developed, and many of the young domestics have become members of a movement campaigning on behalf of the rights of young workers.

Growing confidence and capacity for self-expression are the product of a sensitive research process, which is itself part of ongoing action. The ENDA experience illustrates both the action-research-action cycle, and the value of putting the voices of young people at the centre of research on their behalf.

In Dakar, however, only one-third of domestic servants live in employers' houses. This makes external meetings practicable, whereas elsewhere they may only be possible to arrange for older children. There is also a network of urban community organizations based on people's place of origin to provide a "way in". The older women in these organizations, while they may have tried to dominate proceedings, were those whom ENDA originally enlisted to make the tea debate take place. So their contribution was important.

It should be noted that in all the above in-depth research techniques, the results would not provide or depict a complete picture of the child labour situation at the national level since they are only micro-level studies. Repeating such techniques all over a country would require a tremendous amount of resources - both human and financial. It would also be difficult to avoid double-counting of the working children. Nonetheless, the techniques are effective research methods for focused studies of specific categories of child labour in selected areas and communities in a country.

In addition to noting the child's responses to specific questions, you may also want to write down some of your observations: "observation' is a useful research technique. Immediately after the interview is over, write a few paragraphs about the child. If you are working with a colleague, the colleague could write the observation while the interview is going on. But in this case the colleague should be very unobtrusive and sit somewhere off to the side. If the interview is conducted in a separate room with just the child present, there should only be one adult interviewer or the child is bound to feel overwhelmed.

Have your observation headings ready ahead of time. For example: dress, cleanliness, facial expression, willingness to speak up, body language, signs of emotion, personality, ability to express him/herself. You may think you will remember all these things later when you read your interview notes, but very quickly one interviewee blurs into another.

Other in-depth techniques

Drawing, painting, acting out and story-telling are revealing methods of eliciting information. They are especially useful in cultural settings where people are not used to being bombarded with questions.

Many NGOs use these kinds of techniques within non-formal education programmes. In Indonesia, drama and role-playing are used as a strategy for "breaking the silence" when working with children and young people who are socialized not to speak up in front of adults.

Another technique is the focus group discussion. This is normally a semi-structured session with 6 to 12 participants picked for their special knowledge of the subject. Here, the participants could be child and adult domestics - split into two separate groups. Each group should have a facilitator trained in creating the kind of atmosphere which helps people speak up with confidence. A set of questions can be explored in depth.

to previous section to next section

[Ukrainian]  [English]  [Russian]