Change to Ukrainian interface versionChange to English interface versionChange to Russian interface versionHome pageClear last query resultsHelp page
Search for specific termsBrowse by subject categoryBrowse alphabetical list of titlesBrowse by organizationBrowse special topic issues

close this bookStrategies for Alleviating Poverty in Rural Asia (BIDS, ILO; 1985; 346 pages)
View the documentPreface
View the documentAcknowledgements
Open this folder and view contentsPART ONE: AN OVERVIEW
Open this folder and view contentsPART TWO: AN ANALYSIS
close this folderPART THREE: COUNTRY CASE STUDIES
Open this folder and view contentsAn Evaluation of Selected Policies and Programmes for the Alleviation of Rural Poverty in Bangladesh, by Qazi Kholiquzzaman Ahmad and Mahabub Hossain
Open this folder and view contentsAn Evaluation of Policies and Programmes for the Alleviation of Rural Poverty in India, by D. Bandyopadhyay
close this folderAnti-Poverty Policies in Rural Nepal, by Mahesh Banskota
View the document1. Introduction
close this folder2. Dimensions of Rural Poverty
View the document2.1 Food availability and consumption
View the document2.2 Income levels
View the document2.3 Employment levels
View the document2.4 Inequality
View the document2.5 Consumer durables
View the document3. Anti-Poverty Targets and Policies: An Overview
Open this folder and view contents4. The Small Farmer Development Programme
Open this folder and view contentsRural Poverty and Anti-Poverty Policies in Pakistan, by M. Shaukat Ali
Open this folder and view contentsRural Poverty and Operation Land Transfer in the Philippines, by Mahar Mangahas
Open this folder and view contentsAn Evaluation of Policies and Programmes for the Alleviation of Poverty in Sri Lanka, by Piyasiri Wickramasekara
Open this folder and view contentsPART FOUR: PROCEEDINGS OF A REGIONAL SEMINAR
View the documentANNEX - List of Participants
View the documentBACK COVER
 
2.1 Food availability and consumption

In a country that is largely agricultural with over 90 per cent of the households engaged in basically food production activities, food availability may be a useful starting point for any discussion on the question of rural poverty. However, food availability, by itself, may not mean much as actual consumption may be supported more through trading activities than local production. But seen in terms of the significance of food producing activities in the country, it cannot be said to be irrelevant. In Nepal food consists of cereal grains and cereal products, pulses, vegetables, spices, fruits and nuts, meat, milk and eggs, etc. Cereal grains like rice, maize, wheat, millet and barley account for about 60 per cent of total consumption of cereals. Table 5.1 which shows the total supply and availability over the years suggests that the availability has been declining slowly One source estimates that during the period 1964/65 - 1978/79 food availability declined by 13.4 per cent or 4.51 gms./year. “The Central Food Research Laboratory’s norm of 2256 calories per capita per day to be obtained from 605 gms. of cereals and 60 gms. of pulses for survival was never met during the period 1964/65 - 1978/79”.1 The situation since 1979 has worsened because of the extremely poor performance of the agricultural sector.

1 P.K. Mudbhary, Food Supply & Distribution System in Nepal, Agricultural Project Services Centre, Kathmandu, 1981, pp. 9-10.

Table 5.1 Per Capital Food Grain Availability in Nepal 1964/65-1979/80

(Foodgrain Quantities in ‘000 tonnes)

Year

Gross Production of Food-grains

Edible Cereal Production

Exports of Food-grains

Food-grains Received as Food Aid

Year-end Stock with Govt.

Mid-Year Population
(million)

Per Capita Availability
(Grammes/Day)

1964/65

3270

2044

122

-

1

10.10

522

1965/66

3358

2116

50

1

2

10.28

550

1966/67

3138

1992

122

1

11

10.46

488

1967/68

3206

2008

91

-

6

10.65

494

1968/69

3320

2084

102

1

3

10.85

501

1969/70

3450

2174

98

1

2

11.04

516

1970/71

3486

2183

100

-

7

11.29

504

1971/72

3492

2170

150

-

2

11.56

480

1972/73

3303

2137

48

40

16

11.80

491

1973/74

3706

2330

64

3

23

12.06

514

1974/75

3781

2410

57

8

50

12.58

508

1975/76

3908

2436

221

1

41

12.84

475

1976/77

3704

2332

99

1

28

13.14

468

1977/78

3585

2262

39

4

56

13.43

449

1978/79

3653

2302

65

7

32

13.72

452

1979/80

3196

2000

-

29

n.a.

14.03

400

Source: P.K. Mudbhary, Food Supply & Distribution Systems in Nepal, Agricultural Projects Services Centre, Kathmandu, 1981 p. 8.

Given the great regional heterogenity in Nepal, some reference to the ecological differences is necessary to provide a more realistic picture. Table 5.2 shows the nature of foodgrain balance in different ecological belts. The picture is unmistakable. The number of deficit districts is increasing, primarily in the hills. In general both the national and regional food availability situation suggests that it has not improved over the years. It might have even deteriorated as the opportunities for alternative sources of income and employment have grown very slowly over the years.

Table 5.2 Regional Food Balance in Nepal (1974/75 - 1978/79)

(in tonnes)

 

Mountains

Hills
(without Kathmandu Valley)

Kathmandu Valley

Terai

Total

1974/75

-15586

-12143

-41451

+608340

+539160

1975/76

-19672

-26446

-44964

+649306

+558224

1976/77

-31053

-61549

-48906

+493199

+351691

1977/78

-18354

-84428

-54928

+469136

+311426

1978/79

-19985

-70202

-64165

+466062

+311710

1979/80

-37951

-207463

-85540

+296949

-34005

Note:

‘ - ‘ indicates deficit while ‘ + ‘ indicates surplus.

Source:

P.K. Mudbhary, op. cit. p. 12.

It may be appropriate here to briefly refer to a specific study that examined calories available to different classes of farms. The reference area was very small (i.e. parts of two hill districts) and the results can in no way be generalised for the whole of Nepal; but they are very suggestive of the extensive nature of poverty (in terms of basic survival) in one area in the hills and the mountains. This is shown in Table 5.3. The figures above suggest that a great majority of the farm holdings (in the hills) could not support those living on them anywhere near an adequate nutritional level. Particularly alarming is the high percentage (38 per cent) of farm holdings with an average supporting capacity of only some 1500 cal./day/ACU.

In this context it might also be added that in the hills landholdings below 0.75 ha. appeared generally unable to provide for an average family’s food requirements and this applied to 85 per cent of the household. Similarly for the Terai, farms under 1.7 ha. were too small for supplying basic food requirements and this applied to 50 per cent of the households.1 What this indicates is the critical role of both farm and off-farm employment. Both of these are quite limited, given the huge magnitude of those in need of such types of employment support. Given the pressures already active in Nepalese agriculture, it is doubtful how much scope there is for increasing labour-intensity of Nepalese agriculture. While every effort must be made to enhance productivity in the agricultural sector,2 the role of non-agricultural activities in rural poverty reduction cannot be overemphasised.

1 K. Zeverring, Agricultural Development and Agrarian Structure in Nepal, (processed), ILO, Bangkok, 1978, pp. 6-9.

2 In this context, it may be noted that in 1964/65, Nepal had the highest average paddy yields/ha, in South Asia. Today it is no longer so and there are no signs that it is improving.

Table 5.3 Average Calorie Intake by Farm Size in Two Hill Districts of Nepal

Farm Holding
Size Class

Calorie Intake Per Day per ACUa from Grain Output

Average Calorie Intake/Day per ACU in Classb

Percent of Households in Class

Extremely Small

1500 or less

1205

38

Very Small

1500-2250

1945

22

Small

2250 or more

3255

40

Notes:

a

ACU stands for Adult Consumption Unit represented by an adult man who is given a coefficient of 1.0. Women and children are adjusted accordingly.

 

b

Recommended Calorie Levels are:

     

Sedentary Work - 2400 cal./day/ACU

     

Moderate Work - 2800

     

Heavy Work - 2900

Source:

L. Birgegard, Household Baseline Survey, Rasuwa/Nuwakot Development Project, The Socio-Economic Unit, Project Coordinator’s Office, Kathmandu, 1978, pp. 25.

to previous section to next section

[Ukrainian]  [English]  [Russian]