Change to Ukrainian interface versionChange to English interface versionChange to Russian interface versionHome pageClear last query resultsHelp page
Search for specific termsBrowse by subject categoryBrowse alphabetical list of titlesBrowse by organizationBrowse special topic issues

close this bookStrategies for Alleviating Poverty in Rural Asia (BIDS, ILO; 1985; 346 pages)
View the documentPreface
View the documentAcknowledgements
Open this folder and view contentsPART ONE: AN OVERVIEW
Open this folder and view contentsPART TWO: AN ANALYSIS
close this folderPART THREE: COUNTRY CASE STUDIES
Open this folder and view contentsAn Evaluation of Selected Policies and Programmes for the Alleviation of Rural Poverty in Bangladesh, by Qazi Kholiquzzaman Ahmad and Mahabub Hossain
Open this folder and view contentsAn Evaluation of Policies and Programmes for the Alleviation of Rural Poverty in India, by D. Bandyopadhyay
close this folderAnti-Poverty Policies in Rural Nepal, by Mahesh Banskota
View the document1. Introduction
Open this folder and view contents2. Dimensions of Rural Poverty
View the document3. Anti-Poverty Targets and Policies: An Overview
close this folder4. The Small Farmer Development Programme
View the document4.1 Borrowing and repayment
View the document4.2 Assets and income
View the document4.3 Access to food
View the document4.4 Problems and policy implications
Open this folder and view contentsRural Poverty and Anti-Poverty Policies in Pakistan, by M. Shaukat Ali
Open this folder and view contentsRural Poverty and Operation Land Transfer in the Philippines, by Mahar Mangahas
Open this folder and view contentsAn Evaluation of Policies and Programmes for the Alleviation of Poverty in Sri Lanka, by Piyasiri Wickramasekara
Open this folder and view contentsPART FOUR: PROCEEDINGS OF A REGIONAL SEMINAR
View the documentANNEX - List of Participants
View the documentBACK COVER
 
4.1 Borrowing and repayment

During the survey year (1979/80) 75 per cent of the project members had borrowed from various credit agencies while for the non-project members, the percentage was only 55. The average amounts borrowed in project groups in the hills and the Terai were Rs. 1808 and Rs. 1885 respectively, while in the non-participating group the amounts were Rs. 750 and Rs. 1156 respectively. The proportion of borrowings from institutional and private sources shows substantial differences between the project and non-project groups (Table 5.6).

Table 5.6 Nepal: Distribution of Credit Obtained under SFDP by Source

Sources

Project Group

Controlled Group

 

Amount

%

Amount

%

Institutions

1,357

73.35

128

13.17

Private

493

26.65

844

86.83

Source: Nepal Rastra Bank, An Evaluation Study of Small Farmers Development Prefects of Nepal, Kathmandu, 1982, p. 41.

Data on the purpose of borrowing also showed some differences between the project group members and the non-project members. For instance, in the case of project group 66 per cent of the borrowing was for capital expenditure followed by consumption (19 per cent) and farming (8 per cent) expenditures. The figures for the non-project group was 68 per cent for consumption, 24 per cent for capital and 8 per cent for farming expenditures. The major items in capital expenditure for the project group were purchases of livestock, poultry and development of irrigation (see Table 5.7).

Table 5.7 Rural Nepal: Average Borrowings Per Farm Family by Purpose

(Amount in Rs.)

Purpose

Project Group

Controlled Group

 

Amount

%

Amount

%

1. Farming Expenditure

150

8.10

83

8.54

 

Inputs

126

6.81

57

5.86

 

Payment of Wages

8

0.43

5

0.52

 

Other Costs

16

0.86

21

2.16

2. Capital Expenditure

1,219

65.90

229

23.56

 

Irrigation

150

8.11

4

0.41

 

Purchase of Livestock and Poultry

920

49.73

108

11.11

 

Purchase of Tools/Equipment

10

0.54

29

2.98

 

Purchase of Land

93

5.03

83

8.54

 

Horticulture

35

1.90

5

0.52

 

Others

11

0.59

-

-

3. Consumption Expenditure

354

19.14

353

36.32

4. Others

127

6.86

307

31.58

 

Repayment of Old Debt

40

2.16

11

1.13

 

Business House Construction etc.

87

4.70

296

30.45

 

1,850

100.00

972

100.00

Source: Same as for Table 5.6, p 14.

The performance of the controlled group appears to be better in terms of actual repayment of the total repayment requirement in both the hills and the Terai. This is not unexpected as public sector institutions are more lax regarding loan recovery than the private sector loans.

Table 5.8 Rural Nepal: Debts and Their Repayment

   

Total Debt

Total Repayment Requirement

Actual Repayment

% of Repayment to Total Repayment Requirement

Project Group

Hill

3,221

1,468

587

39.98

 

Terai

4,319

1,916

834

43.53

Controlled Group

Hill

1,365

894

446

49.88

 

Terai

2,130

1,130

835

73.89

Source: Same as for Table 5.6, p. 29.

to previous section to next section

[Ukrainian]  [English]  [Russian]