Change to Ukrainian interface versionChange to English interface versionChange to Russian interface versionHome pageClear last query resultsHelp page
Search for specific termsBrowse by subject categoryBrowse alphabetical list of titlesBrowse by organizationBrowse special topic issues

close this bookStrategies for Alleviating Poverty in Rural Asia (BIDS, ILO; 1985; 346 pages)
View the documentPreface
View the documentAcknowledgements
Open this folder and view contentsPART ONE: AN OVERVIEW
Open this folder and view contentsPART TWO: AN ANALYSIS
close this folderPART THREE: COUNTRY CASE STUDIES
Open this folder and view contentsAn Evaluation of Selected Policies and Programmes for the Alleviation of Rural Poverty in Bangladesh, by Qazi Kholiquzzaman Ahmad and Mahabub Hossain
Open this folder and view contentsAn Evaluation of Policies and Programmes for the Alleviation of Rural Poverty in India, by D. Bandyopadhyay
Open this folder and view contentsAnti-Poverty Policies in Rural Nepal, by Mahesh Banskota
close this folderRural Poverty and Anti-Poverty Policies in Pakistan, by M. Shaukat Ali
View the document1. Some Basic Facts about Rural Pakistan
View the document2. Rural Poverty
Open this folder and view contents3. Anti-Poverty Policies
View the document4. Zakat and Ushr
View the document5. Conclusions
Open this folder and view contentsRural Poverty and Operation Land Transfer in the Philippines, by Mahar Mangahas
Open this folder and view contentsAn Evaluation of Policies and Programmes for the Alleviation of Poverty in Sri Lanka, by Piyasiri Wickramasekara
Open this folder and view contentsPART FOUR: PROCEEDINGS OF A REGIONAL SEMINAR
View the documentANNEX - List of Participants
View the documentBACK COVER
 

2. Rural Poverty

Several estimates of rural poverty in Pakistan are available for the sixties and a few for the seventies. Most of them used data from the household income and expenditure surveys (HIES) available for selected years and made their estimates on the basis of a ‘poverty line’ determined according to some nutritional norm. Results from some of them are reported in Table 6.2. The differences in methodology and sources of data used in deriving these estimates render it almost impossible to draw any definite conclusion on the intertemporal behaviour of rural poverty. Even a uniform methodology and data source as in Naseem’s study yields different trends of poverty when alternative poverty lines are considered. The results of 1977 and 1979 are hardly comparable since the sample size and methodology of the two surveys are quite different.

Since Irfan and Amjad’s study provides estimates of poverty for several years between 1963/64 and 1979 (and thus covers the longest time span amongst the four sources quoted in Table 6.2), it may be useful to look at the trend in poverty revealed in it. According to this study, while between 1963/64 and 1969/70 there was a continuous worsening of the situation, an improvement occurred between the latter year and 1979. However, this improvement only brought back the incidence of rural poverty in Pakistan to the level of 1963/64. Since no fresh household survey has been carried out after 1979, it is not possible to update the above series. However, there are indications of improvement resulting from the outstanding performance in the recent past of the agriculture sector and the inflow of remittances from abroad. During 1978-1983, agriculture attained a growth rate of 4.4 per cent per annum in sharp contrast to 2.2 per cent observed during the earlier five years.1 The remittances which stood at $1,395 million in 1978/79 rose up to $2,850 million in 1982/83.2 Since most of the Pakistani labourers working abroad, particularly in the Middle East, belong to the low-income rural families, these remittances are expected to have raised the income of the relatively poorer section of rural population.3

1 Ministry of Finance, op. cit.

2 World Bank, Pakistan: Recent Economic Developments, February 1984.

3 According to the findings of the survey carried out at the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, on the average, a Pakistani migrant remits about $2,800 in cash annually for two to four years. Roughly 84 per cent of the migrants are production workers, with 43 per cent unskilled and 41 per cent skilled. The unskilled workers are mostly general labourers, but 12 per cent are reported to come from agriculture sector. See Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Labour Migration from Pakistan to the Middle-East and Its Impact on the Domestic Economy. Research Reports No. 126, 127 and 128. Islamabad, 1981.

Table 6.2 Incidence of Rural Poverty in Pakistan

Year

Per Cent of Households below Poverty Line

Author and Source of Data

Definition of Poverty Line

I. 1963/74

39.5

G.B.S. Mujahida

Annual per capita income of Rs. 300 at 1959/60 prices (fixed arbitrarily)

 

1966/67

53.1

HIES

 
 

1969/70

47.6

   

II. 1963/64

79b

S.M. Naseemc

A consumption level enabling a household to obtain at least 95 per cent of the recommended minimum calorie intake per head (2,100 calories)

 

1969/70

76

HIES

 
 

1971/72

82

   

III. 1977

21

Planning Commissiond Micro-Nutrient Survey

Minimum calorie intake of 2,550 calories per adult.

IV. 1963/64

40.5

M. Irfan and Rashid Amjade

Per capita income needed to obtain 2,550 calories per adult.

 

1966/67

46.3

   
 

1969/70

51.5

HIES

 
 

1979

39.8

   

Notes and Sources:

a

G.B.S. Mujahid, ‘A Note on the Measurement of Poverty and Income Inequalities in Pakistan: Some Observations on Methodology’, Pakistan Development Review, Autumn, 1978.

 

b

The author also considered alternative poverty lines based on 92% and 90% of minimum calorie requirement. The corresponding estimates of trends in poverty were 62%, 56%, 65% and 54%, 45%, 54% respectively.

 

c

S.M. Naseem, ‘Rural Poverty and Landlessness in Pakistan’ in ILO, op. cit.

 

d

Planning Commission, Government of Pakistan, The Micro-Nutrient Survey of Pakistan. Islamabad, 1978.

 

e

M. Irfan and Rashid Amjad, ‘Poverty in Rural Pakistan’ in Khan and Lee, op. cit.

Malnutrition is but one expression of poverty. Limited availability of the social services particularly education, health care, electricity, roads, and communications is another manifestation. The availability of these services when expressed in some measurable statistics is known as the quality of life index. The data on some of these indices, are reported in Table 63 for the years 1978/79 and 1982/83. The table suggests that over this period a considerable improvement has taken place in the quality of life of the rural population particularly in terms of access to electricity, clean water and sewerage facilities. Despite this, however, the level of literacy, enrolment of school-age population and access to safe drinking water, health services and electricity remains rather low and limited.

Table 6.3 Quality of Life Indices, Rural Pakistan

Index

1977/78

1982/83

A. Education

   
 

1. Literacy Rate (%)

14

15

 

2. Participation Rate of Children in Primary Schools (%)

28

40

 

3. Participation Rate of Children in Secondary Schools (%)

18

21

B. Health

   
 

1. Population per Doctor (No.)

92,588

52,530

 

2. Population per Health Centre (No.)

277,765

163,546

 

3. Population with Access to Clean Water (%)

14

22

 

4. Population with Access to Sewerage (%)

0.25

4

 

5. Crude Death Rate (per 000’)

 

12

 

6. Infant Mortality (age 0-1), (per 000’)

 

100

 

7. Mortality in Pre-school Age (1-4), (per ‘000’)

 

10

 

8. Maternal Mortality (per 000’)

 

6-8

 

9. Life Expectancy (Years)

 

55

C. Electricity

   
 

1. Proportion of villages electrified (%)

16.9

36.4

 

2. Rural Consumption as % of total national consumption

4.8

6.0

D. Roads

   
 

1. Road per sq. km. of the area (sq. km.)

0.10

0.12

Source: Planning Commission, Government or Pakistan, The Fifth and the Sixth Five Year Plans of Pakistan.

to previous section to next section

[Ukrainian]  [English]  [Russian]